Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007.
نویسندگان
چکیده
PURPOSE Recent reports have suggested that 40% or more of National Cancer Institute (NCI) -sponsored Cooperative Group phase III trials failed to achieve their accrual goals. We examine in detail the accrual experience of the Cooperative Group phase III trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS All Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007 were examined for their accrual experience. For trials that stopped accrual with < 90% of their accrual goal, the reasons for having < 90% accrual were documented. We focus on trials that ended with < 90% accrual because of inadequate accrual rates rather than for other reasons, such as an interim monitoring analysis by an independent data monitoring committee that stops the trial early because one treatment is clearly superior. RESULTS There were 191 trials activated from 2000 to 2007. We project that 22.0% of these trials will have < 90% accrual because of inadequate accrual rates. We project that there will be 176,627 patients eventually accrued on the 191 trials (current accrual, 154,579) and that 2,991 of these patients will be on trials that have < 90% accrual because of inadequate accrual rates (1.7%). For nonpediatric cancer trials, the corresponding percentages are 26.7% and 2.0%. CONCLUSION We find that insufficient accrual rates are not as high as previously reported and that only a small proportion of patients were enrolled on trials that ended with insufficient accrual because of an inadequate accrual rate. NCI has implemented new procedures to reduce the number of trials that fail to reach their accrual goals and to minimize the number of patients accrued on these trials.
منابع مشابه
National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program: Experience and Lessons Learned
PURPOSE To increase access of underserved/health disparities communities to National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trials, the Radiation Research Program piloted a unique model - the Cancer Disparities Research Partnership (CDRP) program. CDRP targeted community hospitals with a limited past NCI funding history and provided funding to establish the infrastructure for their clinical research p...
متن کاملClinical trial development as a predictor of accrual performance--letter.
In the November 15, 2010 edition of Clinical Cancer Research, Cheng and colleagues describe an important finding, namely, the association between trial development time and accrual success (1). Their article also reports accrual success rates for NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)-sponsored trials. This publication formally publishes the finding that 40% of cancer clinical trials of a...
متن کاملense of Urgency: Evaluating the Link between Clinical Trial elopment Time and the Accrual Performance of Cancer
Download pose: Postactivation barriers to oncology clinical trial accruals are well documented; however, pol barriers prior to trial opening are not. We investigate one such barrier: trial development time. erimental Design: National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)–sponsored for all therapeutic, nonpediatric phase I, I/II, II, and III studies activated between 2000 and...
متن کاملClinical Trial Characteristics and Barriers to Participant Accrual: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience over 30 years, a Historical Foundation for Trial Improvement.
Purpose: Slow-accruing clinical trials delay the translation of basic biomedical research, contribute to increasing health care costs, and may prohibit trials from reaching their original goals.Experimental Design: We analyzed a prospectively maintained institutional database that tracks all clinical studies at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). Inclusion criteria were activated phase...
متن کاملAddition of lenalidomide to melphalan in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group MY.11 trial
Oral melphalan and prednisone remain an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with multiple myeloma. For approximately 40 years, this combination has been the standard of care for patients not proceeding to stem cell transplant. Within the last 10 years, new agents have been found to be efficacious in the relapsed/refractory setting. Within the last year, two trials of added thalidomid...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
دوره 28 35 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010